NERC Compliance
TPL-001-5
One Minute Summary - TPL-001-5
Transmission System Planning Performance Requirements
Purpose:
Establish transmission system planning performance requirements
Ensuring the reliable operation of a Bulk Electric System (BES) under various system conditions and contingencies
Functional Entity:
Planning Coordinator
Transmission Planner
Requirement R1
Maintain system models with MOD-032 standard
Requirement R2
Annual planning assessment:
Use current or qualified past studies
Document assumptions
Steady State Analyses
Short Circuit Analyses
Stability Analyses
Requirement R2 2.1 Near-Term Steady State Analyses
Assessed annually and supported by current or qualified past studies
Qualifying studies need to include the following conditions:
System Peak Load (2.1.1):
Maximum load that the system experiences for either the first or second year, and for the fifth year of the study period
System Off-Peak Load (2.1.2)
Lowest load at least one of the five years in the study period.
Sensitivity Analysis (2.1.3)
By varying one or more of the conditions, the study should analyze how the system responds.
Real and reactive forecasted load
Expected transfers
Expected in-service dates of new or modified transmission facilities
Reactive resource capability
Generation additions, retirements, or other dispatch scenarios
Controllable loads and demand side management
Duration or timing of known transmission outages
Impact of Known Outages (2.1.4):
Impact of planned outages of generation or transmission facilities
The known outages selected for the assessment must adhere to a documented outage coordination procedure or technical rationale
Should not be limited by the duration of the outage and should include the worst-case scenarios.
P0 and P1 category with peak and off-peak load
Impact of Spare Equipment Strategy (2.1.5):
Major transmission equipment being unavailable, and such equipment has a lead time of a year or more (e.g. Transformer)
P0, P1, and P2 category with equipment unavailability
Requirement R2 2.2 Long-Term Steady State Analyses
Assessed annually and supported by current or qualified past studies
Expected System peak Load conditions for one of the years in the Long-Term Transmission Planning Horizon
Requirement R2 2.3 Near-Term Short Circuit Analyses
Assessed annually and supported by current or qualified past studies
Determine whether circuit breakers have interrupting capability for Faults
Requirement R2 2.4 Near-Term Stability Analyses
Assessed annually and supported by current or qualified past studies
System Peak Load (2.4.1):
Maximum load that the system experiences for one of the five years.
Load model with expected dynamic load behavior, Considering the behavior of induction motor Loads.
Aggregate System Load model of overall dynamic behavior of the Load
System Off-Peak Load (2.4.2):
Lowest load that the system experiences for one of the five years.
Sensitivity Analysis (2.4.3):
By varying one or more of the conditions, the study should analyze how the system responds.
Load level, load forecast, or dynamic load model assumptions
Expected transfers
Expected in-service dates of new or modified transmission facilities
Reactive resource capability
Generation additions, retirements, or other dispatch scenarios
Impact of Known Outages (2.4.4):
Impact of planned outages of generation or transmission facilities
The known outages selected for the assessment must adhere to a documented outage coordination procedure or technical rationale
Should not be limited by the duration of the outage and should include the worst-case scenarios
P1 category with peak and off-peak load must include, at a minimum, known outages that are expected to produce more severe system impacts
Impact of Spare Equipment Strategy(2.4.5):
Major transmission equipment being unavailable, and such equipment has a lead time of a year or more (e.g. Transformer)
P1, and P2 category with equipment unavailability which is expected to impact more severe
Requirement R2 2.5 Long-Term Stability Analyses
Assessed annually and supported by current or qualified past studies
Impact of generation additions or changes
Requirement R2 2.6 Past studies' requirement
Past steady state, short circuit, or Stability analysis are used to support
Five calendar years old or less
No material changes with supporting documents
Requirement R2 2.7 Corrective Action Plan for System inability
Addressing how the inability system to meet performance requirements (Table 1)
Can be revised in subsequent Planning Assessments
List System Deficiencies and Actions (2.7.1):
Examples:
Installing, modifying, retiring, or removing transmission and generation facilities and associated equipment
Installing, modifying, or removing Protection Systems or Remedial Action Schemes
Installing or modifying automatic generation tripping in response to single or multiple contingencies to mitigate Stability performance violations
Installing or modifying manual and automatic generation runback/tripping in response to single or multiple contingencies to mitigate steady state performance violations.
Using Operating Procedures specifying their duration as part of the Corrective Action Plan
Using rate applications, Demand-Side Management (DSM), new technologies, or other initiatives
Address Multiple Sensitivity Studies (2.7.2):
○ actions to address performance deficiencies identified in multiple sensitivity studies or
OR provide a rationale explaining why actions are not necessary.
Handling Situations Beyond Control (2.7.3):
When situations are beyond the control and prevent the implementation of a Corrective Action Plan
Actions to the use:
Non-Consequential Load Loss and
curtailment of Firm Transmission Service
Document that they are taking
Actions to resolve the situation and must document
The situation causing the problem
Alternatives evaluated
The use of Non-Consequential Load Loss or curtailment of Firm Transmission Service
Review in Subsequent Planning Assessments (2.7.4):
The Corrective Action Plan must be reviewed in subsequent annual Planning Assessments
Requirement R2 2.8 Corrective Action Plan for interrupting duty in short circuit analysis
List System Deficiencies and Actions
The Corrective Action Plan must be reviewed in subsequent annual Planning Assessments
Requirement R3 Requirement for Near-Term and Long-Term Steady State Analyses R2 2.1 and R2 2.2
Planning Events Studies (3.1):
Studies need to be performed for planning events in Requirement R3, Part 3.4.
Extreme Events Studies (3.2):
Studies should assess the impact of extreme events identified in Requirement R3, Part 3.5.
If cascading due to extreme events are concluded, an evaluation is needed to reduce or mitigate the consequences
Contingency Analysis (3.3):
Simulate the removal of all relay elements and other automatic controls
Include the tripping of generators when generator voltage is less than minimum voltage or ride-through voltage
Include the tripping of Transmission elements where relay loadability limits are exceeded
Simulate the expected automatic operation for steady-state control, such as:
Phase-shifting transformers
Load tap changing transformers
Switched capacitors and inductors
Identification of Severe Planning Events in Requirement R3, Part 3.1 (3.4):
Planning events produce more severe system impacts
Create list of contingencies
Coordination between the Planning Coordinator and Transmission Planner with adjacent entities
Identification of Severe Extreme Events in Requirement R3, Part 3.2 (3.5):
Extreme events produce more severe system impacts
Create list of contingencies
Coordination between the Planning Coordinator and Transmission Planner with adjacent entities
Requirement R4 Requirement for Near-Term and Long-Term Stability Analyses R2 2.4 and R2 2.5
Planning Events Studies (4.1):
Studies need to be performed for planning events in Requirement R4, Part 4.4.
P1 category
Generating unit should pull out of synchronism.
P2 through P7 categories
Generating unit pulls out of synchronism.
Resulting apparent impedance swings should not result in the tripping of any transmission system
P1 through P7 categories
Power oscillations must exhibit acceptable damping
Extreme Events Studies (4.2):
Studies should assess the impact of extreme events identified in Requirement R3, Part 3.5.
If cascading due to extreme events are concluded, an evaluation is needed to reduce or mitigate the consequences
Contingency Analysis (4.3):
Simulate the removal of all relay elements and other automatic controls
Include successful and unsuccessful high-speed (less than one second) reclosing into a fault.
Include the tripping of generators when generator voltage is less than minimum voltage or ride-through voltage
Include the tripping of Transmission elements where transient swings cause it
Simulate the expected automatic operation for dynamic control, such as
Generation exciter control and power system stabilizers,
Static VAR compensators
Power flow controllers
DC Transmission controllers
Identification of Severe Planning Events in Requirement R4, Part 4.1 (4.4):
Planning events produce more severe system impacts
Create list of contingencies
Coordination between the Planning Coordinator and Transmission Planner with adjacent entities
Identification of Severe Extreme Events in Requirement R4, Part 4.2 (4.5):
Extreme events produce more severe system impacts
Create list of contingencies
Coordination between the Planning Coordinator and Transmission Planner with adjacent entities
Requirement R5 Establish voltage criteria
Steady state voltage levels
Post-Contingency voltage deviations
Transient voltage response
Minimum low voltage level
Maximum duration for which transient voltages can be below that level.
Requirement R6 Document the criteria or methodology
Includes identify system instability for conditions such as:
Cascading
Voltage instability
Uncontrolled islanding
Requirement R7 Determine each entity's responsibilities
Requirement R8 Sharing Planning assessment results
Share with adjacent Planning Coordinators and adjacent Transmission Planners within 90 calendar days of completing
Within 30 days of a request of Planning assessment results